The Saudi Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman, has openly embraced the accusations of “sportswashing” as a means to rehabilitate Saudi Arabia’s tarnished image. As the country seeks to increase its influence in international sports, the Crown Prince recognizes the financial benefits it brings. In an interview with Fox News, he boldly stated that if sportswashing can increase the GDP by 1%, he is willing to continue this practice, regardless of the criticism it receives. This article delves into the concept of sportswashing and its impact on both Saudi Arabia’s reputation and the world of sports.
Sportswashing is a term coined by critics who argue that Saudi Arabia is using its sports investments to gain political influence globally and divert attention away from human rights abuses. The kingdom has significantly ramped up its sports investments in recent years, with substantial financial deals to recruit top players from Europe, such as Cristiano Ronaldo and Neymar, to Saudi soccer clubs. The Saudi Public Investment Fund, under the control of Crown Prince Mohammed, has played a crucial role in these investments, supporting both Saudi soccer clubs and the recently formed LIV Golf.
Critics highlight that the increasing involvement of Saudi Arabia in international sports raises serious concerns. Firstly, they argue that sportswashing enables the kingdom’s government to whitewash its tarnished reputation due to human rights violations, including the killing of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi. By associating itself with prestigious sports events and renowned athletes, Saudi Arabia hopes to shift the public’s focus away from these issues. Moreover, critics argue that the investment in golf and soccer is part of a wider strategy to gain influence and shape international perceptions about the kingdom.
One recent move that has faced significant backlash is the merger between LIV Golf and the PGA Tour. Critics, including key U.S. lawmakers, view this merger as an attempt by Saudi Arabia to distract from its human rights record. Furthermore, concerns have been raised regarding national security, as U.S. officials have previously identified Saudi Arabia’s connections to the 9/11 attacks. Given that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi nationals, the kingdom’s involvement in high-profile international sports raises concerns about its intentions and implications.
The proposed merger between LIV Golf and the PGA Tour faced substantial challenges and controversies. Prior to the deal, LIV Golf sued the PGA Tour for alleged anticompetitive practices, leading the PGA Tour to countersue, claiming that LIV Golf was stifling competition. The golf organizations faced a substantial existential threat from LIV Golf, which holds the potential to significantly impact the control and direction of international golf tournaments. However, the proposed merger has faced severe criticism from lawmakers who argue that it only serves to distract from Saudi Arabia’s poor human rights record.
Benjamin Freeman, the director of the Democratizing Foreign Policy Program at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, argues that sportswashing is not just a business deal but a deliberate influence operation. The intention behind Saudi Arabia’s involvement in international sports is to shape public opinion and perceptions, both domestically and abroad. By showcasing Saudi Arabia as a supportive ally of prestigious sports organizations and attracting top athletes, the kingdom aims to cultivate a positive image while diverting attention from its controversial actions.
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s open acceptance of sportswashing as a means to enhance Saudi Arabia’s reputation reflects his determination to utilize any effective method for economic growth. However, critics argue that this strategy undermines the seriousness of human rights abuses and allows the kingdom to escape accountability. As Saudi Arabia continues to invest heavily in international sports and court top athletes, the implications of sportswashing will undoubtedly remain a topic of intense debate and scrutiny.
Leave a Reply